Why ChatGPT and Claude Are Yesterday’s News: Using IDE as Your Writing Assistant
2 min read Just now
My recent testing shows a 15–20% reduction in my writing time by using an IDE (Integrated Development Environment) as a writing assistant with Markdown for formatting. This approach proves significantly more efficient than traditional AI chatbots like Claude or ChatGPT + Notion
💎 Key Benefits
- Smart Autocomplete: The standout feature. Writing becomes effortless — just hit Tab and watch your thoughts complete themselves
- Easy to add / exclude files that will be analyzed: Access a free RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system. Seamlessly navigate between files, add context, and even search the web when needed
- Always Ready: Your IDE is likely already running if you’re a developer, and you’re probably already paying for it
- Markdown is the king: Get instant formatting that’s compatible everywhere. Export your work effortlessly to Notion, Google Docs, or any web platform
- Model Flexibility: Switch between different AI models (Claude, GPT, LLaMa) without leaving your editor
- Code Integration: Generate and test code snippets instantly within the same environment
- Smart Editing: Powerful batch editing features — make a change once and apply it throughout with a single Tab press
💊 Potential Drawbacks
- Learning Curve: Initial setup requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with VSCode-style editors
- Cost Factor: Requires a subscription ($20 monthly)
- Output Quality: Since these tools are primarily designed for code generation, the quality of non-technical content might not match dedicated writing AI platforms
- Autocomplete Quirks: The suggestion system isn’t perfect — expect occasional hiccups
This approach might not be for everyone, but for those willing to invest time in setting it up, it offers a powerful alternative to conventional AI writing tools.